MigraineMind research summary
The Headache Needs Assessment (HANA) survey: psychometric properties of the Turkish version in migraine.
Cranio | 2026
Observational studySummary
This study focused on adapting and validating the Turkish version of the Headache Needs Assessment survey. The survey contains seven items that assess migraine needs. Researchers evaluated structural validity using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis with 79 participants. They assessed reliability using Cronbach's α, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, and Bland-Altman plots. The study analyzed convergent validity by correlating HANA with other headache assessment tools. EFA identified a two-factor structure for HANA A, explaining 69% of variance. A single-factor structure was found for HANA B, confirmed by CFA with acceptable indices. Cronbach's α was above 0.879, indicating high reliability. The ICC ranged from 0.784 to 0.836, showing excellent consistency. HANA correlated moderately to strongly with the Headache Disability Inventory and HIT-6. It showed weak correlation with the Visual Analog Scale and Migraine Disability Assessment. The Turkish HANA demonstrates robust psychometric properties for clinical and research purposes. Clinical relevance: This study confirms that the Turkish HANA survey reliably assesses migraine needs in clinical settings.
Key Learning Points
- The Turkish version of the Headache Needs Assessment survey effectively evaluates migraine needs in patients.
- The survey has been shown to have high reliability, making it a trustworthy tool for clinicians.
- Structural validity was confirmed, indicating that the survey accurately measures what it intends to assess.
- The Turkish HANA correlates well with established headache assessment tools, supporting its relevance in practice.
- This survey can be used confidently in both clinical and research settings to improve migraine management.
Original research
Read the original publication and review its full methods and findings on PubMed.
MigraineMind is an educational resource designed to complement—not replace—the original scientific literature or clinical judgement. This page is an AI-generated summary of the available paper information and may contain errors. Please consult the original publication.
