MigraineMind research summary

Greater occipital nerve block versus intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block in chronic migraine with failure of at least two oral preventive treatments: a prospective, non-randomised patient-preference comparative study.

Acta Neurol Belg | 2026

Observational study
AuthorsPektaş S, Turan SA
JournalActa Neurol Belg
Publication year2026
PubMed ID42837040

Summary

This study compared two treatments for chronic migraine: greater occipital nerve (GON) block and intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block. Both treatments were given to patients who failed at least two oral medications. Researchers followed 100 patients over six months, focusing on their migraine frequency, pain intensity, and medication use. Out of these, 78 patients completed the study with data collected at one, three, and six months. The GON block involved an injection of bupivacaine, while the SPG block used a topical method. The study aimed to see if the two treatments led to different outcomes. Results showed both treatments could help reduce migraine symptoms, but the study did not randomize patients into groups. This research provides valuable insights into alternative treatment options for chronic migraine sufferers who haven’t found relief from traditional medications. Clinical relevance: This study suggests that GON and SPG blocks can effectively reduce chronic migraine symptoms when oral medications fail.

Related migraine research topics

Original research

Read the original publication and review its full methods and findings on PubMed.

MigraineMind is an educational resource designed to complement—not replace—the original scientific literature or clinical judgement. This page is an AI-generated summary of the available paper information and may contain errors. Please consult the original publication.